The Value of Scale in Pharma's Future
Despite the increasingly common perception of the helpless mega-merged giant, vastly increased scale can provide such companies with significant competitive advantages, from which companies were unwilling or unable to benefit in the past. The largest companies, structured properly, should be able to discover disproportionately more compounds; develop them faster; and market them more successfully. But to reap these benefits, the super heavyweight pharmas will, paradoxically, have to learn how to think small.
You may also be interested in...
Company scale is a negative predictor of value creation among biopharmaceutical companies, says a new analysis by L.E.K. Consulting, and industry’s largest companies have simply become too large to generate significant shareholder return going forward. How can the largest pharmaceutical companies adapt to an environment where they’ve become too big to succeed?
Observers and investors are placing their bets on the outcome of Europe's first hostile pharma bid, Sanofi-Synthelabo's proposed takeover of Aventis, and on whether the resulting entity would indeed be able to thrive against competitors such as GSK and Pfizer. But even against the checkered backdrop of past pharmaceutical mergers, it remains unclear whether Sanofi can achieve even an average amount of savings from such a deal.
A recent CenterWatch Inc. study of 11 major pharmaceutical company mergers suggests that the downturn in sales and marketing figures for consolidated firms is accompanied by decreased R&D output.