Behind Scios-J&J: No Groundswell for M&A
Executive Summary
While the investment banking world does its best to sing the virtues and likelihood of biotech consolidation, the industry isn't paying attention. Indeed, perhaps the most interesting aspect of J&J's acquisition of Scios isn't the fact that J&J outbid the competition, but just how little competition it had to outbid for one of the very few clearly successful product-oriented biotechs.
You may also be interested in...
Reviewing Five Years of Big Pharma's Biotech Acquisitions
A review of the past five years' significant ($100mm or greater) pharma-biotech acquisitions among the industry's largest players illustrates Big Pharma's diverging M&A strategies, and why there's more to come. We examine who's buying and how much has been spent, and take a look at who has succeeded in getting value (and pipeline) for money.
Reviewing Five Years of Big Pharma's Biotech Acquisitions
A review of the past five years' significant ($100mm or greater) pharma-biotech acquisitions among the industry's largest players illustrates Big Pharma's diverging M&A strategies, and why there's more to come. We examine who's buying and how much has been spent, and take a look at who has succeeded in getting value (and pipeline) for money.
Viewing Risk Through a Medicines Co. Lens
The Medicines Co. (TMC) has pioneered a strategy of in-licensing otherwise unwanted-compromised--late-stage products that it can acquire for little money and then, moving quickly to approval, drive sales through Phase IV positioning trials. The financial equation works for investors who are realizing that, as Big Pharma interest in signing large-dollar discovery deals wanes, they will now have to fund both technology and product development. That dramatically changes the risk/reward ratio which made investing in discovery-based biotechs worthwhile-and makes a development strategy like TMC's more attractive. The strategy is hardly risk-free: many compromised products are compromised because they don't work; and even when they do, the developer doesn't know a priori in which indications they do work-one of the reasons the company almost failed.