Deal Statistics Quarterly, Q1 2003
In Vivo presents another installment of our quarterly reivew of dealmaking--in this case January-March 2003. Our data come from Windhover's Strategic Transactions Database. We include medical device financings by deal type; diagnostic financings by industry segment; pharma and biotech alliances by therapeutic category and industry segment; pharma and biotech financings by market segment, and pharma and biotech M&A.
You may also be interested in...
While the investment banking world does its best to sing the virtues and likelihood of biotech consolidation, the industry isn't paying attention. Indeed, perhaps the most interesting aspect of J&J's acquisition of Scios isn't the fact that J&J outbid the competition, but just how little competition it had to outbid for one of the very few clearly successful product-oriented biotechs.
The financial markets are having a tough time understanding the combination of biotech companies Enzon and NPS Pharmaceuticals, perhaps because it doesn't follow the typical rationale for intra-biotech mergers. That is, it doesn't join competitors working with similar technologies or disease states. Rather, the companies have little overlap, an attraction they argue will result in a balanced, somewhat synergistic product portfolio. Still, they face the challenge of convincing divergent investor groups--earnings-oriented shareholders of Enzon and growth-chasing investors in NPS--that the resulting new company wo'n't be a hodge-podge of diverse technologies.
Roche Diagnostics and Epigenomics AG, a start-up diagnostics company, have signed a three-year collaboration to find new cancer diagnostic markers, a deal that could bring Epigenomics as much as $100 million--if all of the markers covered get to market. Epigenomics is working on DNA methylation based biomarkers for cancer and will identify the markers; Roche will develop them into tests and market them worldwide.