A Wave of Success for Cambridge Heart
For years, Cambridge Heart has been in an almost missionary mode. Since its founding in 1990, it has spent millions on R&D and sustained steady losses. But it finally looks like Cambridge Heart is well on the way to answering the two key questions for medical technology developers: clinical relevance and reimbursement. On March 21, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued a national coverage decision for Cambridge Heart's Microvolt T-Wave Alternans test for patients at risk of sudden cardiac death,
You may also be interested in...
Cardiovascular investigators are now asking new questions, including how can treatment be targeted to those most likely to benefit, and when does aggressive treatment become too much? At the 2006 American Heart Association (AHA) meeting, these questions were at the top of everyone's list, and several highly anticipated studies attempted to provide some answers.
Although big companies grabbed the headlines with problems, 2006 proved to be a strong year for the medical device industry and growth prospects look strong. Our selection of the device industry highlights of 2006 includes: Boston Scientific-Guidant deal: the winner may be Abbott; Device IPO market remains strong; Drug-eluting stent safety debate; Conflicts of interest: (physician relationships with companies); The bid for Biomet; VC Pendulum shifts towards medical devices; Kyphon bids for St. Francis; and Diagnostic imaging and in vitro diagnostics converge.
The clinical trials MADIT II and SCD-HeFT definitively proved the benefit of ICDs for preventing the risk of sudden cardiac death and paved the way for reimbursement. But now that the excitement has died down, the confusion has set in. Clinicians aren't entirely sure in which real-world patients to implant devices. The debate about the proper methods of risk stratifying patients for ICD implantation rages on.