In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Renewed DES Safety Debate Creates Second Generation Mover Advantage

Executive Summary

Recent clinical trial analysis has revived the debate over the safety of drug-eluting stents (DES), creating the possibility that safety, rather than efficacy, may turn out to be a differentiating factor for companies developing next-generation products.

You may also be interested in...



TCT Debates Cardiology's "Climate of Calamity"

The real story that came out of this year's Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) meeting held in October in Washington, DC, is not the news per se regarding specific clinical trial results or new device technologies. Instead, it is the story behind the news. Interventional cardiology has been built on the back of evidence-based medicine. That methodology, however, has come under attack in the last year.

COURAGE Trial: Bad News Again for Stents at ACC, Or Is It?

For the second year in a row, results from a clinical trial announced at the annual American College of Cardiology (ACC) conference appeared to be bad news for coronary stents. The outcomes from the COURAGE trial, announced at this year's ACC meeting in New Orleans at the end of March, found that angioplasty with stenting did not reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events when added to optimal medical therapy.

AHA Wrap-Up: Studies Emphasize Improved Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness

Cardiovascular investigators are now asking new questions, including how can treatment be targeted to those most likely to benefit, and when does aggressive treatment become too much? At the 2006 American Heart Association (AHA) meeting, these questions were at the top of everyone's list, and several highly anticipated studies attempted to provide some answers.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

IV002836

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel