In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Overheard at JP Morgan's 25th Health Care Conference: Making Up for Lost Drugs: Pharma Attempts to Appease Investors

Executive Summary

The annual JP Morgan conference has always been a stage for reviewing new solutions to the basic business-model problem of biotechnology. But as Big Pharma's troubles have grown, the conference has also become a showcase for large drug company problems. The quick fix: keep shareholders in the stocks by returning cash to them. Medium term: adopt one of four basic business models. Longer term: disaggregate.

You may also be interested in...



Bristol Revs Its R&D Engine: An Interview with Elliott Sigal and Francis Cuss

Just one year ago, Bristol-Myers Squibb's days as an independent entity seemed numbered. But thanks to the resolution of the Plavix crisis, innovative deal-making, and an R&D pipeline surging with specialty-focused products, the company is now thriving. In a free-wheeling Q&A, Bristol's R&D gurus, Francis Cuss and Elliott Sigal, discuss the need for a new kind of biopharma that is specialty-focused and technology agnostic.

Public Venture Capital for Israel's Biotech Industry

Israeli biotech is hot -- lots of ideas and lots of entrepreneurs. But the industry is chronically short of management and venture money. For the latter, companies have turned to Israel's recently deregulated stock market.

20% Solution: Addressing the Biotech/Pharma Logjam with Innovation Partnerships

While pharma needs to access biotech's innovation, biotechs and their investors are unwilling to cede late-stage control. This is a recipe for stalemate: the industry needs different partnership structures which fully pay biotech for innovation (with royalties of 20% or more) and leave early-stage development in their hands, while allowing Big Pharma to do the later-stage development and commercialization. To afford these deals, however, Pharma needs to cut their own spending on innovation.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

IV002900

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel