In Vivo is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Best of the Blog: IN VIVO, April 2008

Executive Summary

"Best of the Blog" is a monthly column highlighting the best of our free online content at www.windhover.com/blog. In April: Televancin Delayed by Grassley's Ketek Data Integrity Rule; Diabetes Drug Development and Regulatory Risk: Why the Guidance May Be Good News; and Mircera: Bad for Patents, Good for Patients?

You may also be interested in...



A CERA-ous Challenge to Amgen's EPO Franchise?

How serious is the follow-on biological challenge from Roche's CERA to Amgen Inc.'s $6 billion erythropoietin (Epogen) franchise? Serious enough to move Amgen from a growth favorite to a biotech bargain. Serious enough to threaten the ability of Amgen and Procrit manufacturer Johnson & Johnson Inc. to find new dollars in the EPO world market in 2009 and beyond.

Shadow FDA? Researchers Are Taking Approval Matters into their Own Hands

Drug and biotech companies will face an emerging trend of outside interference on pending drug reviews at FDA. The events surrounding the final outcome of FDA's review of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck's diabetes drug muraglitazar (Pargluva) signal that outside medical centers and prominent researchers will voluntarily play a larger role in drug safety oversight in the future.

Arbor Emphasizes Risks Of Its Own Product In Suit Against US FDA To Block Nymalize Generics

FDA concluded that original formulation of brain hemorrhage treatment was not discontinued for safety or effectiveness reasons, saying Arbor had other options to reduce risk of confusion between the new and original formulations. But the sponsor argues that withdrawal was part of FDA-approved risk mitigation plan.

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS143249

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel