To Outperform In Pharma, Go Deep – Not Broad
The world’s most successful pharma companies aren’t winning on the basis of absolute scale; they succeed instead thanks to their leadership in a few clearly defined product categories. That approach delivers outsized returns, while helping firms navigate a changing health care landscape where payers and providers increasingly demand evidence of treatment efficacy.
You may also be interested in...
For decades, biopharma companies have relentlessly pursued growth, counting on pure scale and M&A cost synergies to create value. This strategy is reaching its limits and becoming counterproductive, according to Bain & Co. analysis. Megamergers that don’t produce category leaders also don’t create portfolios that are likely to deliver attractive shareholder returns over time.
A broad vaccines portfolio, a blockbuster asset swap with Novartis, and an R&D revamp including significant, long-term investment in technology platforms have cemented GlaxoSmithKline’s leadership in a perennially lucrative business that is core to its corporate ethos. Why hasn’t anyone seemed to notice?
Gilead holds a 90% market share in the U.S. hepatitis C market, with Harvoni capturing roughly 85% of the aggregate treatment population. AbbVie hopes an imminent Japanese approval and a second-generation regimen will boost its HCV business.