Transatlantic Tit For Tat
Echoing other transatlantic rifts, FDA commissioner Mark McClellan argues that America, with its unrestricted drug pricing, is paying Europe's drug R&D bill. Pharma companies agree. European authorities-the only faction with the power to alter pricing policies-don't. But the public disagreement hasn't prevented closer cooperation between the FDA and the EMEA. The agencies' recently announced confidentiality agreement paves the way for better information sharing and could simplify the complex European regulatory arena. But it won't necessarily speed approvals-some drug firms argue that it may even slow them down.
You may also be interested in...
By keeping pharmaceutical prices and utilization artificially low, Europe is losing more economically than it gains, says consulting group Bain & Co. Here's why-and what the drug industry should do about it
The European regulators' rejection of PharmaMar's lead anti-cancer drug Yondelis in November 2003 was a significant setback for Spain's flagship biotech. But the decision was close; some experts still feel the drug should have been approved. Indeed, although critics claim PharmaMar could have done more to ensure its trial design was satisfactory, the experience highlights weaknesses in Europe's centralized drug approvals procedure of which other firms should be aware. All the more so since the centralized route will likely soon be compulsory not only for biologics, but also for all products in cancer, HIV/AIDS, neurodegenerative disease and diabetes, and all designated orphan drugs.
It's hard to fault the FDA commissioner for his even-handed treatment of the two drug industries--branded vs. generic--and the competing social imperatives they stand for: new drug research and affordability. In recent speeches, Mark McClellan, MD, PhD, has been making the branded industry's case both for higher drug reimbursement from Europe and against parallel imports from Canada. And he's also been pushing for making it easier for branded generic drugs to hit the market. The only problem with this balancing act: he has far more power to quickly advance the generic agenda than the branded one.