J&J crossed by Red Cross?
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Johnson & Johnson is suing the American Red Cross for violating its exclusive trademark rights to the Red Cross design and use of the word "Red Cross" on commercial products. The suit, filed Aug. 8 in New York federal court, cites ARC's licensing of the trademark - used by J&J on first-aid supplies since 1887 - to businesses selling products including baby mitts, combs and humidifiers, and notes the organization only has rights to the emblem in connection with non-profit relief services. ARC called the suit "obscene," explaining that it has taken the step to license the emblem to expand access to emergency preparedness supplies...
You may also be interested in...
The American Red Cross can lawfully use its Red Cross emblem on commercial products, despite J&J's contention that it violates its rights to the design, New York federal judge Jed Rakoff rules May 14. J&J filed the suit in August 2007 (1"The Gray Sheet" Aug. 13, 2007, In Brief). Rakoff ruled against American Red Cross counterclaims that Johnson & Johnson was violating the trademark rights
Pain relief product sales grew 27% and upper respiratory sales 35% for the week ended 7 March as consumers respond to COVID-19, according to Nielsen data noted in a Jefferies report on consumer health purchasing trends. Private label market share is up slightly, while OTC purchases continue primarily in conventional stores.
Managing partner Corey Goodman said venBio didn’t have trouble closing its fund, because the venture capital firm prepared its investors for an economic downturn months ago.