In Vivo is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Class III Device Recalls An Afterthought? Not So Fast . . .

This article was originally published in The Silver Sheet

Executive Summary

Low-risk class III medical device recalls sometimes fade into the background because they comprise only a sliver of the overall corrections and removals in a given year. Nevertheless, manufacturers should be aware that any decisions they make regarding class III actions are still going to receive FDA attention. One example: “The justification for not reporting a recall is an area that the agency frequently takes a very close look at,” CDRH Recall Branch Chief Ron Brown says. When FDA wrote its recalls regulation it left the decision about whether to report class III events up to manufacturers. Reporting such low-risk recalls is not required by the agency, but is obviously encouraged if firms discover that the risk to device users is somewhat significant. Such a gray area can leave firms wondering about when it’s necessary to report class III’s – or even whether they should be reported in the first place.

You may also be interested in...



Keeping Track: US FDA Clears Esperion’s Nexletol, Baudax’ Anjeso, Agile’s Twirla

The latest drug development news and highlights from the Pink Sheet’s US FDA Performance Tracker.

Esperion’s Nexletol Reaches The Cholesterol Market Priced To Sell

Esperion obtained an on-time approval of Nexletol (bempedoic acid) for a pair of LDL cholesterol-lowering indications on 21 February. 

Pharmacogenetic Tests: US FDA Tries Off-Label Approach To Guide Consumers

US FDA’s latest effort to provide guidance for consumers on pharmacogenomics tests underscores the challenges the agency faces in the absence of a clear regulatory framework for lab-developed tests – and with no easy mechanism to update labels for off-patent drugs.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT036825

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel