In Vivo is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Lady Burd v. Estee Lauder

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

Trial date for Indelible Lips trademark infringement case set for April 3. Manhattan federal court refuses Estee Lauder's argument that the mark is a generic phrase in a Dec. 3 decision. The court states that because the term "Indelible Lips" is a registered mark owned by Lady Burd Exclusive Cosmetics, "the burden of proof falls on Estee Lauder to demonstrate genericness." It is disputable whether Indelible Lips is "directly descriptive of a property of certain lipsticks or is indirectly suggestive of some property of the lipsticks in question," the court says
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS007607

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel