In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

False Weight Loss Claims Land Firm In FTC Complaint, Amazon Could Act Next

Executive Summary

In FTC's "first case challenging a marketer’s use of fake paid reviews on an independent retail website," agency files complaint alleging Cure Encapsulations Inc. paid an "amazonverifiedreviews.com" to create and post Amazon reviews of its Quality Encapsulations Garcinia Cambogia Extract with HCA supplement. Emails from the firm to amazonverifiedreviews included, "Please make sure my product should stay a five star.”

You may also be interested in...



FTC: Paying A Big-Name Beauty Influencer To Smear A Competitor Is Unlawful … In These Contexts

Marketing insiders are denouncing the growing trend of beauty companies weaponing influencers against competing brands. Mary Engle, associate director of FTC’s Division of Advertising Practices, discusses the practice and lines that shouldn’t be crossed, blurry as they may well be.

Clinical Trials For Supplement Claims Not An FTC Rule, But A Standard

FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection official Richard Cleland takes on the hot-button issue by explaining that a supplement health or structure/function claim doesn't need support from research with the size and scope of studies looking at the safety and efficacy of a drug ingredient proposed for a certain indication. Supplement ad claims, though, still need competent and reliable scientific evidence as support.

Opiate Addiction Treatment Claim Comes With $235,000 Price Tag For Sunrise Nutraceuticals

The proposed order imposes a nearly $1.4m judgment in consumer redress or asset disgorgement, though all but $235,000 is "suspended based on the defendants’ ability to pay," according to FTC. If the firm and its owner "are later found to have misrepresented their financial condition," the entire amount will be due.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS148575

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel