US/EU Avandia decisions varied because of "toolbox", says FDA expert
This article was originally published in Scrip
Pharmaceutical companies wanting to learn more on how different decisions are made by different regulatory agencies on their products (while using the same data) should take notice of one expert with the FDA. It seems it relies on the tools available to regulators.
You may also be interested in...
The US Food and Drug Administration recently signalled its desire to work more closely with other drug regulators in assessing the quality of pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities around the world.
It seems as if the US FDA is softening its stance on assessing the quality of pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities around the world in future, with an apparent desire to work more closely with other drug regulators. However, incorporating the regulators from countries such as India, China and Japan into a global inspectorate still looks problematical.
Large pharmaceutical companies and Médecins sans Frontières may not often see eye-to-eye over access to medicines in poor countries. But it seems as if industry and the humanitarian body, a prominent critic, do agree that competition works in improving access to vaccines, even though they don't agree about the mechanisms of price setting.