In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

CV Therapeutics: Co-Promoting Without Pharma

Executive Summary

Consolidation in the pharmaceutical industry probably means that small biotechs like CVT will find drug companies either uninterested in co-promoting niche products or looking for too large a piece of the profits. Through its innovative deal with Quintiles' CSO, Innovex, CVT obtains considerable sales and marketing muscle, some up-front cash that it can invest in R&D, and gets to keep most of the profits from ranolazine. Innovex, on the other hand, stands to garner royalty payments that will substantially exceed its fee for service margins.There are likely to be more Innovex/CVT-type deals in the near future, as biotechs look for a share in the profits of the drugs that they help to sell. But biotechs like CVT have other options when it comes to co-promotion partners, including Big Biotech, medium-sized drug companies, and ex-US firms looking to increase their US presences.

You may also be interested in...



The Outsourcing Dilemma

The drug industry has accepted the need to outsource R&D--now, with sales productivity down, and the rising cost and risk of owning too much commercial infrastructure, why not outsource more of the sales effort, too? Big and small pharmas resist the idea but will eventually have to accept it--junior partners in licensing deals are insisting on roles in selling their own products, and Big Pharma must investigate cost-saving solutions.

Abbott's ‘Bedrock Of Good Health’ Nutritionals Business Faces Mounting Infant Formula Litigation

Nutritional product business had 5.1% Q1 sales growth and is like Abbott’s other segments, “super well-aligned to the global demographics and trends in health care,” says CEO Ford. But as it defends complaints of damages from powder formulas made at facility found with unsafe levels of bacterial contaminants, Abbott’s also targeted in litigation alleging failure to warn about risk of infants born prematurely developing necrotizing enterocolitis if fed cow’s milk-based formula.

‘Core Pillars’ Of Safety And Innovation Take Center Stage In FDA Reports

The US FDA has issued a pair of reports focused on device safety and innovation. The reports describe recent steps the agency has taken to improve in the two areas, and what it plans to do next.

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

IV001403

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel