In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Idec and Coulter Face Off

Executive Summary

Two makers of new antibody therapies for cancer are engaged in a fierce battle that's all about positioning. Idec recently won FDA's approval for {Rituxan}, which Genentech is co-promoting in the US. But young Coulter is proclaiming its {Bexxar}, still two years from market, will surpass {Rituxan} to become the gold standard treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Will the companies limit each other's opportunities?

You may also be interested in...



Genta's Clinical Quest

In one of the biggest late-stage biotech licensing deals ever, Genta has given Aventis worldwide rights to Genasense. The antisense compound targets Bcl-2, a protein now known to protect cancer cells from death messages. The firms are betting that giving patients this compound in combination with conventional therapies will kill cancer more effectively. The potential is high, but risk remains. Bcl-2 is unproven as a target, and designing clinical trials for two agents is not straightforward. Emerging from a troubled past, Genta initially decided to take the compound to market in the US all on its own. It focused on helping desperately ill patients in small disease indications. Eventually, as encouraging data accumulated, the small firm realized it would be better off partnering. The focused indications that Genta chose, and the way it pursued them, made strategic sense for it-but Aventis aspires to develop the drug against major cancer cancers. The large firm can afford to think bigger: it has more money and resources and the benefit of coming in after Genta laid the groundwork. Both companies are being guided by theories and observations, fully aware that such things mean little to regulators who demand clinical evidence. As befits their respective size and scope, the firms have different approaches to managing the risks of novelty.

Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April

Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.

Health And Wellness Weekly Trademarks Review: 16 April

Trademarks are registered and published for opposition with the US Patent and Trademark Office and are published weekly in the agency's Official Gazette.

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

IV000864

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel