In Vivo is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Half-Year Tally in Clinical Diagnostics

Executive Summary

The top seven IVD manufacturers had lackluster 4% growth (in local currency) during the first half of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, but the weaknesses were not evenly distributed. Perhaps the largest story in diagnostics these days is the surprising deterioration of the self-glucose testing market, one of the largest and most profitable sectors of the industry, and until recently, its biggest driver of growth.

You may also be interested in...



Two Rising Stars in Glucose Testing

Despite its attraction, diabetes glucose monitoring remains a tough field for newcomers, who face competition from four major-league, entrenched players. But two of the newer entrants appear to be succeeding--not because of revolutionary technology, but because of partnering savvy, efficient execution, and technological competence. Analysts expect Inverness Medical's symbiotic relationship with LifeScan to help Inverness's diabetes sales grow 30% a year as LifeScan pushes Inverness-made products as a major part of its fight to regain its market leadership. Home Diagnostics Inc.'s success with co-branding raises the prospect that discounting, until now not a significant factor, will become much more common in the field.

US FDA Expects Joint AdComm Briefing Document, Oncology Chief Says

The combined format is the new default for briefing advisory committee members, US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence Director Pazdur declared.

Parallel Scientific Advice: Is The EMA User Fee Impacting Interest?

EMA charges participants to receive scientific advice through the fledgling program, unlike the US FDA, which may not fit the budgets of some complex generic sponsors. At the same time, sponsors also may simply not be aware the program exists yet.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

IV002202

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel