Warner-Lambert: The Virtues and Costs of Focus
Reckoned among the drug industry's walking dead, Warner-Lambert focused its limited resources on the marketing and development of a handful of compounds, succeeded brilliantly--and saved the company. But what did this focus cost?
You may also be interested in...
In an interview, Peter Corr, the new head of the industry's largest R&D organization, argues that scale, properly managed, can solve the key problem for innovative R&D organizations: the ability to feed both early- and late-stage development. Smaller firms create unbridgeable pipeline gaps by having to focus on the late-stage and starving the early work. Moreover, Pfizer is making a huge investment in attrition-reducing early-clinical technologies, especially imaging, to find biomarkers which will tell researchers whether a drug is working in humans before it begins more expensive trials. Again scale is crucial: Pfizer's investment can be amortized over a large number of projects, making it financially more affordable and productive for Pfizer than a similar investment would be for smaller companies. To increase the utilization and productivity of this investment, Corr wants to increase Pfizer's in-licensing of preclinical and Phase I compounds--a dramatic change in Pfizer's licensing habits, which have focused on late-stage opportunities and the acquisition of discovery platforms.
Just five weeks before the US election, a Medtech Insight analysis shows medical device companies are spending more on Democrat Joe Biden’s campaign than on Republican Donald Trump’s.
Denmark’s Orphazyme has raised more funds to market its lead product, the heat shock protein amplifier, arimoclomol, in the US and Europe, and to evaluate the compound for other lysosomal storage and neurodegenerative disorders.