Dealmaking on a Small Planet: Medical Device Transactions 2001
Dealmaking in the device industry is occasional and incremental when compared with the level of activity in pharmaceuticals, the result of that industry's maturing into a handful of dominant players, not all of which see acquisitions as strategically critical to their long-term success. The less-than-robust public market for small device companies is both symptom and cause of the device dealmaking lull. Because the markets they target are generally too small to sustain years of significant growth, few investors are willing to invest in them as stand-alone companies. And without long-term investor support, smaller firms have few options other than to sell out to large companies and little negotiating leverage when they do so.
You may also be interested in...
Transparent number-crunching is back in vogue. Companies that pursue obfuscating accounting strategies to finesse their bottom line may suffer from a new form of ED: the Enron Discount. But so long as the investment community is clamoring for a simple answer (earnings growth) to the complex question of a company's fiscal health, companies will continue to use whatever GAAP-approved means is necessary to appease.
Over the past two years, UK-based Gyrus Group has been transforming from an electromedical business built on its PlasmaKinetic technology into a more focused surgical device play focusing on tissue management and, more specifically, head and neck surgery.
Tyco's acquisition of CR Bard and Medtronic's purchase of MiniMed were announced almost simultaneously, but they hardly are true representations of ongoing consolidation in the medical device industry. Tyco bought Bard for manufacturing and distribution synergies, and Tyco officials talked about leveraging Bard as a growth platform in a slow-growth industry. Medtronic bought insulin pump maker MiniMed to expand into a significantly growing field in which it hasn't yet participated.